Effective Nuclear Charge Calculator

Sodium's outer electron feels 2.20 of its eleven protons, which is why it comes off so readily.

Clear
Effective nuclear charge3.75felt by a 4s electron of Iron
Actual nuclear charge26
Screening constant22.25
Fraction of the nucleus shielded85.58%
Configuration1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶ 3d⁶ 4s²
Slater's rules are an empirical fit from 1930, not a calculation from first principles. They reproduce the trends across periods and down groups well, and individual values only to within a few tenths.

The formula

Zeff = Z - S, with S from Slater's rules

What the outer electron actually feels

Sodium has eleven protons, but its single 3s electron does not experience eleven. The ten inner electrons stand between, and Slater's rules put a number on how effectively: 0.85 for each electron in the shell just inside, 1.00 for anything deeper, 0.35 for others sharing the same shell. Sodium's 3s electron feels about 2.20, which is why it comes off so easily.

Why atoms shrink across a period

Going from lithium to fluorine, each step adds a proton and an electron to the same shell. The new electron screens its neighbours at only 0.35, so the effective charge climbs steadily and pulls the whole shell inwards. Atomic radius therefore falls across a period even though electrons are being added — a result that looks backwards until the screening is counted.

The d electrons screen badly

Slater treats every electron to the left of a d electron as screening fully, which is why iron's 3d electron feels 6.25 while its 4s electron feels 3.75. The rules are a fit to spectroscopic data from 1930 and they are crude, but they capture the trends that matter.

Models, and where they stop

Slater's rules, the Kapustinskii equation and Pauling's ionic-character expression are all empirical fits, not derivations. They were built to reproduce measured numbers with arithmetic simple enough to do by hand, and they succeed at that within perhaps five or ten per cent. Where a page here quotes one, it says which — a figure from a fitted rule and a figure from a Born-Haber cycle are not the same kind of thing, even when they agree.